Sunday, June 26, 2005

Employee discount for everyone!

General Motors, the ailing Detroit behemoth, has been touting its employee discount for everyone promotion on virtually all its brands (such as Saturn, Saab, Hummer, Buick and Chevrolet). This seems like a major gamble for a company burdened with the fixed costs of pension schemes and healthcare coverage. (p. 350).

GM clearly thinks that the demand for its vehicles is price elastic, although I'm not sure this will bear out in the medium-term, at least not for its top-drawer models. The company markets its Saabs and Buicks as quality, luxury cars - were its original buyers price sensitive? And, will reducing prices not dilute the power of the brand? Perhaps GM sould have limited the promotion to its mid-range vehicles.

The company is clearly trying to grapple a larger market share with the cash discount offered (p. 375). Granted, it faces strong competition from other carmakers but it may well be shooting itself in the foot. Firstly, consumers (especially those to whom GM's high-end brands are targeted) may react in unexpected ways to this same-for-less approach (p. 264): Is GM going out of business? Will the company ditch some brands? Have its prices been artificially high in the past, i.e. was I conned on my last GM car purchase?

Plus, the company has just declared a de facto price war. What will be its reaction if Ford, Nissan or Volkswagen follow suit? I doubt that GM would emerge unscathed in a scrap with an Asian manufacturer (p. 384).

As Joseph Jaffe mentions on his blog, it will be impossible for GM to ever beat this promotion. What future offer would beat "You pay what we pay"?

However, I disagree with Jaffe's negative view of the customer lifetime value approach (p. 16). This may well be GM's saving grace. If the products are decent, introducing GM vehicles to new market segments will provide the company with new and valuable customer connections that may attract consumers to the company's products for the long-haul.

Building Chinese Brands

Linda's presentation on the Chery car got me thinking about brands in China. The country is notorious for its counterfeits of luxury goods, toys and electronics brands. As the quality of the fakes churned out increases, why don't local businesspeople develop home-grown brands? A recent article in Fortune magazine asks the same question.

It's only a matter of time for China's industries to realise that the brand owner collects most of the profit, not the manufacturer. Already some Chinese industries are purchasing western brands (such as Haier's bid for Maytag and Lenovo with IBM), but the international business community should really be prepared for China's new great leap forward: From being the world's factory to developing the intangible value associated with powerful brands.

A comparison of marketing strategies

This post will examine the key similarities and differences in the marketing strategies of Dell, Coca-Cola and Wal-Mart, focuising on the four Ps of the marketing mix; Product, Price, Promotion and Place.

Product. All three organisations offer a wide range of products. Dell's include personal computers, MP3 players, servers and other IT peripherals. Coca-Cola owns over 400 brands, combining global and local brands in a hybrid brand structure. The local brands (such as Kuat a guarana-based drink marketed in Brazil) cater to local tastes, but also serve as testing grounds for products that may be released globally. Being the world's largest retailer, Wal-Mart carries a vast aray of products in its big-box stores, offering a one-stop-shop for most goods and services purchased by families.

Promotion. Wal-Mart spends over US$ 100 million annually on advertising and marketing. A significant amount of its advertising budget is spent on promoting its everyday low prices, new store openings and price "rollbacks". But this is not the only key message the company is trying to get across. Through www.walmartfacts.com, its sponsorship spots on NPR and the company's recent foray into the world of reality TV , Wal-Mart also promotes itself as a caring employer, neighbour and corporate citizen. In the past, Coca-Cola's main communications channel (Principles of Marketing, p. 478) was television (can you remember the "If I could teach the world to sing..." campaign?). However, media fragmentation, the rise of the internet and other technological advances have decreased TV's effectiveness. The company is now focusing more closely on associating its products with the spirit of competition, youth and passion through sporting events, such as its Olympic Games sponsorship deal. Dell promotes its products mainly through direct marketing channels, like www.dell.com, e-mail promotions and catalogue sales. The company has also recently opened kiosks in shopping malls to cater to shoppers who prefer to see the actual products before commiting to an online purchase (Dell Direct).

Price. Wal-Mart sometimes employs promotional pricing strategies to temporarily reduce their products' prices to below list- or cost-price. However, the company's "Always Low Prices, Always" positioning is Wal-Mart's simple pricing model: everyday low prices that do not rely on special events or other promotional pricing techniques to keep shoppers in its stores (p. 378). Having a strong competitor such as Pepsi, has forced Coca-Cola to have coherent pricing strategies. These differ for each product and depend on the time and place. For instance, the company used a low price model in the US in the early 1990s to reduce private (or store) brands' market share (p.293). Once this succeeded, Coca-Cola raised its prices to position itself as a superior product vis-à-vis the store brand colas. Dell employs a number of pricing strategies in order to maintain its leadership in the market and maximize its revenue. These include customer segmented pricing (selling the same product at two or more prices, where the price difference is not based on cost differences); optional-product pricing (consumers are invited to customize their computer by adding on accessories); and product bundle pricing (offering consumers combined products and services for less than the sum of their individual prices). (pp. 372, 375-6).

Place. All three organisations have a transnational presence. Dell has manufacturing plants and offices spread across the globe and customises its site to major markets (e.g. www.dell.fr, www.dell.com.br). Wal-Mart has also spread outside the United States and currently has operations in 10 countries. But, exporting its approach and corporate culture has not been without hiccups in markets such as Germany and South Korea . Of the three companies, Coca-Cola has the strongest and widest global presence. It has almost 100% brand recognition with western consumers and a presence even in "failed states" such as Somalia .

Wednesday, June 22, 2005

The Dell Team Post...

...can be found here

Sunday, June 19, 2005

Niche Marketing at the Paris Airshow

This small enterprise has staked a piece of turf at Le Bourget, rubbing shoulders with Boeing, Airbus, Embraer, et al.: Dispatches From the Paris Air Show .

Sir Bob to the rescue

eBay merchants trying to cash in on the free Live 8 concert in London did not count on Bob Geldof (eBay withdraws tickets for Live 8 concert from sale). The online auctioneer posted tickets for the (free) concert for sale on its site, some of which had attracted bids of over US$ 1800.00. In a move that would have made other citizen action publics proud (Principles of Marketing, p. 110), eBay pulled the tickets off its web site after less than 24 hours online.

Can eBay live without Google?

There have been reports that Google is planning to start an internet payment system to rival PayPal (SiliconValley.com). This is all well and good, except that PayPal is owned by eBay, which happens to be one on Google's main advertisers. Will eBay merchants scale down their advertising on Google in retaliation? Or is Google just too dominant for an online advertiser to ignore?

The Ant Eater on...

...Technorati, Feedster and Yahoo!

Wednesday, June 15, 2005

Price Post: Dell's Pricing Strategies

Dell is well-known for having pioneered the direct sales model in the personal computer industry, marketing directly to businesses and consumers, instead of via intermediaries such as retailers. The company also stands out by building its PCs to customer specifications and delivering the computers directly to the customer. These characteristics - coupled with decent customer service - allow Dell to maintain its position as the top direct sales computer manufacturer in the world, with sales this year of $49,205 million and a growth in sales of 18.7% p.a .(Hoovers).

Nevertheless, although Dell is successful at creating customer value with other marketing mix activities, it also has to capture this value through the prices earned (Principles of Marketing; P. Kotler & G. Armstrong, P. 343). The company thus employs a number of pricing strategies in order to maintain its leadership in the market and maximise its revenue.

Firstly, it employed market-penetration pricing when launching its PCs (Principles of Marketing, p.371). The company charged a low initial price to swiftly penetrate the market and gain a large market share from its main competitors. This approach was successful because the PC market is price sensitive. Also, Dell's low production costs (e.g. achieved through low inventory levels and close relationships with suppliers) and its innovative direct sales model helped keep competitors at bay and sustain the low prices.

Secondly, Dell practices customer segmented pricing, selling the same product at two or more prices, where the price difference is not based on cost differences (Principles of Marketing, p.376). "The Dell Latitude [...] laptop was listed at $2,307 on the company's Web page catering to small businesses. On the Web page for [...] health-care companies, the same machine was listed at $2,228, or 3% less. For [...] governments, it was priced at $2,072.04, or 10% less than the price for small businesses." ("Dell Fine-Tunes It's Pricing to Gain an Edge in Slow Market"; Gary McWilliams. The Wall Street Journal, June 8, 2001). Indeed, www.dell.com has four separate sections catering to different customer segments: individual consumers; small businesses; medium and large businesses; and government, educational and healthcare organisations. All sections presumably offer slightly different prices for the same products. In addition, Dell offers discounts to the employees of corporate customers, further expanding its client base (through my work I can get a 12% discount off most Dell PCs).

Thirdly, Dell excels at optional-product pricing. Consumers are presented with basic PCs on the company's website and are invited to customise their computer by adding on accessories and extra services such as security software, extra memory, or larger monitors before making a purchase.

Fourthly, the company engages in product bundle pricing. It has forged partnerships with different companies to offer consumers combined products and services for less than the sum of their individual prices (Principles of Marketing, p. 375). Examples include Napster (one month free trial with the purchase of a Dell DJ MP3 player), AOL (six months free with the purchase of a PC) and QuickBooks financial software (offered at a reduced price if purchased together with a PC).

Fifth, Dell uses different promotional pricing tactics, such as discounts or rebates to expand its market share and engage competitors in price wars that it is almost certain to win (Principles of Marketing, p. 378). An article in BusinessWeek describes how Dell announced price cuts of around 20% in the past two years, timed with the release of disappointing earnings statements by its rival Hewlett-Packard.

Sixth, Dell "has begun demanding flexible pricing in its contracts with suppliers, many of which also continually update Dell on their own costs" ("Dell Fine-Tunes It's Pricing to Gain an Edge in Slow Market", The Wall Street Journal). This, combined with the phone and web-based direct sales model, allows the company to react quickly to reductions in component prices and pass on the savings to consumers. Competitors that do not have close relationships with their supply chain partners and rely on sales via a bricks and mortar marketing channel will find it impossible to react quickly to suppliers' price changes.

To conclude, Dell's business model and market leadership give it a clear advantage over its competitors for the foreseeable future. Indeed, the current trend of lowering component prices provides a rosy outlook for the company. Dell's built-to-order products are ideal for competing in this environment; "Because it carries less inventory than HP, it can take advantage of the lower prices as they occur"(BusinessWeek).

Tuesday, June 14, 2005

Listening to consumer groups - it's free market research!

I came across a great example of a corporation listening to the cyber chatter about their organisation and acting on it (Reveries).
Top brass at Continental Airlines paid attention to the comments of airmiles enthusiasts on www.flyertalk.com and appear to have addressed them directly. This approach is similar to Dunkin' Donuts' in dealing with the now defunct dunkindonuts.org attack site described in Kotler and Armstrong's Principles of Marketing (p. 134).

Hi-tech bribes in the Heart of Darkness

Our discussions in class yesterday, following Clare's presentation on Hindustan Lever and Holly's presentation on global marketing logistics, turned to bribery in foreign trade. This reminded me of a recent article in the Economist that tipifies the endemic corruption in some (most?) developing countries. It also shows that less developed countries sometimes leapfrog developed states precisely because their basic infrastructure is so underdeveloped. In D.R. Congo, explains the article, useless or non-existent road and telephone networks have spurred the development of airplane routes and nationwide mobile phone networks. And civil servants are even willing to accept bribes telephonically in the form of cell phone credits from across the country...

On the subject of corruption, Transparency International publishes a global ranking of the most corrupt countries in the world. The poll is conducted with international businesspeople and gauges their perception of corruption levels in each country - Finland is currently perceived as the least corrupt country in the world and Haiti as the most corrupt....

Thursday, June 09, 2005

Anti-CRM

Consumer backlash has come to this:
BoingBoing

Wednesday, June 08, 2005

Discrimination against goths

Further to the episode in Blink that Alex brought up in class last week (discrimination by car dealers in Chicago), these two girls tried it out with preppy and goth retailers: BoingBoing.